Intelligent Design Opinion on NPR
Wednesday, December 21st, 2005As you have probably heard, there is lots of controversy over the teaching of Intelligent Design in schools. There was a ruling yesterday that called it unconstutional. Today, I heard a very good opinion about the court decision and I.D. in general. (It is an opinion in favor of it, but I think well balanced.) You can listen to it here: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5065062
Most arguments against Intelligent Design go like this:
-ID is really creationism.
-Creationism deals with religion — ie the supernatural
-the supernatural is not possible
-therefore ID is bad science
Another arguement against Intelligent Design:
-ID takes Evolution, which is an atheistic idea and fills God into the places Evolution has problems.
-ID then really is a “God of the Gaps” theory.
-God is bigger than the Gaps
-ID is bad.
Most arguments for Intelligent Design go like this:
-Evolution is a completely atheistic idea
-Atheisim is bad/wrong
-Creationism is right
-ID is right
I really like the explaination of I.D. in the opinion peice, which is basiclly that ID is looking at the complexities found in biology and looking at empirical evidence to whether those complexities arised out of purely natural-mechincal processes or was there design in it.
